La fin du monde est annulée
Ben oui.
On s’est faites passé une p’tite vite.
Je vous entends déjà dire (ben en faites, vous aviez été nombreux à crier au meurtre après l’article de la Suède) MAIS S’IL N’Y AVAIT PAS EU DE LOCKDOWN, ça aurait été ben pire!
Justement, c’est ça la pogne du siècle: non. (okay, peut-être, j’étais pas fermé à l’idée! Je pensais vraiment que le lockdown CHANGEAIS TOUT.). Ben non toi! What the fuck?
Ce n’est pas ce que nous démontrent TOUS LES PAYS qui n’ont pas imposé de restrictions du tout, ou simplement partiale.
Je vois la tête des gens spinner à l’infini quand je leur dis qu’il n’y a eu que 4 morts lié au Coronavirus à Hong Kong depuis Janvier 2020. Il n’y avait pas eu de lockdown avant fin mars pourtant, et plus de 51 millions de voyageur de la Chine on transité ou voyagé à Hong Kong en cette période. Vous ne me croyez pas?
Tout comme Taiwan:
Mais mais surement si nous n’avions pas eu de lockdown, il y aurait eu plus de mort!
Non. L’iceland à laisser ses écoles ouvertes, restaurants et n’a pas imposé de lockdown extensif (source). Résultat? 10 morts en 4 mois.
Okay mais…
Okay, maintenant le Nicaragua. Je connais bien le pays pour y avoir voyagé. Les médecins du pays sont des gens très respectable… Comme au El Salvador. Ils ont bien plus d’incitatif financière à avoir beaucoup de mort pour avoir de l’assitance à du WHO et des pays gu G20. Le Nicaragua, tout comme la Suède, n’a pas eu de lockdown “official”.
Résultat?
Regardons le Dakota du Sud: Ils n’ont pas imposé de lockdown. Pourtant, ils sont déjà en train d’aplatir la courbe.
Quote intéressant de la gouverneure de l’état:
“I think we’ve got maybe 60 people in the hospital right now. We have 2,500 beds set aside for COVID-19 patients, but we only have 63 in [the hospital]….
We already have cut our peak projections by 75 percent just putting in place the recommendations I asked people to do, staying at home and [practicing] social distancing. They’ve washed their hands and they’ve stayed home if they weren’t feeling well and called their doctors.” (sauce)
Résultat? 9 morts. Sans aucune mesure de restrictions. 9 mort. (sauce)
Ben voyons! Que se passe-t-il?
C’est que la maladie touche surtout les vieux. On l’a vue au Québec: sur 1364 morts au Québec, 1000 avaient plus de 60 ans, mais la plupart avant en haut de 70 ans et avait des conditionés pré-existante.
C’est aussi que… les docteurs se sont fait dire que peut importe la raison de leur décès, s’ils ont des traces du covid19 dans leur sang, bang, y faut marquer dans la cause de décès: “Mort avec le coronavirus”
C’est la direction du WHO (OMS en francais) et du CDC.
Est-ce que je vous dis n’importe quoi? Ben non toi! Ça vient du CDC lui même!
On switch en anglais (de mon article sur le sujet en anglais):
On average, 7700 Americans die per year according to the CDC (mirror alt-link) –However, the CDC asked for every death to be tested for coronavirus…and if tested positive, they ask the doctors to write death from coronavirus (rather than with) on the death certificate. Don’t believe me? That’s the CDC’s instruction (back-up link): Some gold nuggets:
“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death”
“The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID- 19 being the underlying cause more often than not,” the guidelines read.
It gets worst! Check out this great Q/A from the US FDA: “Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E.” Great.
Just to make sure the reader gets it, the CDC says, about the common cold, "Common human coronaviruses, including types 229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1, usually cause mild to moderate upper-respiratory tract illnesses, like the common cold. Most people get infected with one or more of these viruses at some point in their lives. " How many false-positive is there? You would expect a fool-proof testing method before shutting down the world. This is not what is happening. The method gives a bunch of false and true positives. Yet, the governments double-down on their lockdown.
Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek (her clinic) puts it better than I could:
“Few people know how much individual power and leeway is given to the physician, coroner, or medical examiner, signing the death certificate. How do I know this? I've been filling out death certificates for over 30 years.
More often than we want to admit, we don’t know with certainty the cause of death when we fill out death certificates. That is just life. We are doctors, not God. Autopsies are rarely performed and even when an autopsy is done the actual cause of death is not always clear. Physicians make their best guesstimate and fill out the form. Then that listed cause of death … is entered into a vital records data bank to use for statistical analysis, which then gives out inaccurate numbers, as you can imagine. Those inaccurate numbers then become accepted as factual information even though much of it is false. So even before we heard of COVID-19, death certificates were based on assumptions and educated guesses that go unquestioned.
When it comes to COVID-19 there is the additional data skewer, that is –get this— there is no universal definition of COVID-19 death. The Centers for Disease Control, updated from yesterday, April 4th, still states that mortality, data includes both confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19. That’s from their website.
Translation? The CDC counts both true COVID-19 cases and speculative guesses of COVID-19 the same. They call it death by COVID-19. They automatically overestimate the real death numbers, by their own admission. Prior to COVID-19, people were more likely to get an accurate cause of death written on their death certificate if they died in the hospital. Why more accurate when a patient dies in the hospital? Because hospital staff has physical examination findings labs, radiologic studies, et cetera, to make a good educated guess. It is estimated that 60 percent of people die in the hospital. But even [with] those in-hospital deaths, the cause of death is not always clear, especially in someone with multiple health conditions, each of which could cause death.
It doesn’t stop there! This study shows “a potentially high false-negative rate of real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for SARS-CoV-2 in the 610 hospitalized patients clinically diagnosed with COVID-19 during the 2019 outbreak. We also found that the RT-PCR results from several tests at different points were variable from the same patients during the course of diagnosis and treatment of these patients.” What is the true reliability of a RT-PCR test? After all, those are the tests used to justify the shutdown of the modern-day civilization…
Below are two graphs from this reliable source (and good article too) and the CDC. The media don’t tell you that the numbers are…pretty much the same as every single winter in Europe.
Deux docteurs de la Californie partagent leur connaisance (vidéo très recommandée).
C’est l’arnaque du siècle. Un virus qui tue entre 0.03 et 1% (source #1, source #2, source #3, source #4, source #5, source #6) de la population et 90% du temps des gens au-dessus de 80 ans… Nos mesures d’emprisonnement forcé ne font aucun sens sur la base de la cience.
Regardez mes articles… j’ai passé des centaines d’heures à faire les recherchées. L’évidence empirique c’est qu’on s’en est fait passé une petite vite.
Cheers,