Revenge of the D300
Nikon D300 in 2019
So I wrote an article the other day about how the Pen-F was inferior to the D300 when it came to image quality…and it did trigger quite a bit of people…and I get it: I wrote: “My 2007 D300 has a better image quality than the 2017 Pen-F”. It was a bit of an hyperbole, alright. Anything over ISO 800, the Pen-F will be better. But at lower ISO, the D300 is a better camera.
So anyway. I figured I would come back and give a long term review on this twelve year old body. Nikon changed the game with the D300/D3 back in 2007. I had the chance to buy both of them a decade ago. I still think that the D300/D3 are classics: the way they render the colours (RAW texture AND JPG engine) is just more pleasing to my eyes than the latest 20.1 megapixel D500/D7500 sensor. So much so that I ended up selling my D7500 for my inability to like the rendering (RAW and JPG)…and not giving me anything more really than a good ol’ D300.
Take the autofocus for example. It might be slower than the D7500 or D4s, but in real life, as when it comes to bird photography, I rarely missed a shot because of it. The eagle below was taken with the 2.0 TC II (version 2) Nikon on a 300mm f/2.8 VR mounted to the D300. The bird was flying towards me. I was able to nail the focus and track it using the 3D-tracking mode perfectly, at 6 frame per second. It’s that good. It was amazing in 2007 and still is amazing in 2019.
No cost was spared
The D300 still holds its ground in 2019 as the pictures above can tell. It is still a solid choice for anyone that doesn’t need to shoot in lowlight. It shoots 8 frame per second with the optional AA battery holder – and maybe that’s the best feature of this camera: It can use AA batteries. Sounds stupid, but you don’t know how much one will come to appreciate this feature once one goes for months traveling in third world countries…
The ergonomics of the D300 was the best at its time and still is the king. The D300s was slightly better, with a LV button and an “OK” central button, but at the expenses of loosing a very study memory card compartment. That’s right: Nikon used to have a very solid lever system to open the memory card door as seen on the picture below. It felt solid and give the camera a sense of ready-for-war vibe. No cost was spared when they engineered this camera.
The image quality is phenomenal, when you look at the output. Look at the butterfly up above. The details are so sharp…what else is needed? That’s what I’ve been wondering for a while. We had it good in 2007, without even realizing it.
Reliability over portability.
And maybe that’s why the D300 is a better camera than the Pen-F: It always – always – took the shot when I pressed the shutter in the last 12 years. It is an extremely reliable camera. A shot taken by the D300 is a shot that will get written to the memory card. I cannot say the same about the X-Pro2 (I got a few incidents where the camera didn’t record the file properly on the SD card) nor the Pen-F (where it refused sometimes to turn on, or simply wold refuse to take a shot after being in sleep mode (common issue with the Pen-F, not only with the unit I had). It does produce honest result without a fuss. It gives me the shot when I ask for it. And that’s why, even if it’s old and dusty, it still gets a seat in the Jeep to travel the world.
Thank you for stopping by!