The world descending in utter madness.
1984 – Reloaded Edition
As someone said on reddit: You know the world got crazy when unelected oligarchs with no ethics, no moral decency, with megalomania are pushed by MSM and the cabal as the moral authority we all should listen too!
First, read this amazing piece about lockdowns in South America. It’s that good.
Then, well, Billy Gates going full psycho again.
““What are these, like, nudists?” the Microsoft founder said. “I mean, you know, we ask you to wear pants, and no American says, or very few Americans say, that that’s, like, some terrible thing.”
Notable quotes:
The evidence is overwhelming: Masks work to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus.
In places where they're mandated, rates of COVID-19 sink, and one recent model estimated that if all Americans wore them, 63,000 more US deaths could be prevented by March.
But not all Americans are on board, snubbing the face coverings as a political statement against science and for independence.
Bill Gates doesn't get them.
"The idea that somebody's resisting wearing a mask, that is such a weird thing to me," the billionaire Microsoft founder and philanthropist told the actress and comedian Rashida Jones on the first episode of their new podcast series, "Bill Gates and Rashida Jones Ask Big Questions," released Monday.
"What are these, like, nudists?" he said. "I mean, you know, we ask you to wear pants, and no American says, or very few Americans say, that that's, like, some terrible thing."
Jones agreed. "If you want to get back to normal life anytime sooner, wear a mask, or don't wear a mask and stay at home," she said. "But, like, to ask for both things feels like you just want things to be better and they're not, so you kind of just have to deal with what it is."
"The mask helps you open up more things," Gates said.
This psycho can just fuck off…!
Meanwhile, here’s the latest study on the mask, made in Denmark with over 6000 participants (Source) (mirror #1). Google translated of course:
A large Danish study has not found any significant protection against corona infection between two groups, where one wore a mouthpiece while the other failed.
The study has exclusively examined whether the persons with bandages were better protected against the virus and not whether the bandages limited infection by others.
This is stated in a press release issued by Rigshospitalet.
For this reason, among other things, the study cannot be used to conclude anything broadly about the use of sanitary napkins as an effective means of reducing corona infection, according to the researchers behind the study.
The study has examined two groups with a total of over 6,000 participants back in April and May. Here it was not common to wear a bandage in Denmark.
In return, a number of institutions, workplaces and restaurants were closed.
In the group without bandages, 2.1 percent of the participants received corona during the period of the study. 1.8 percent of the participants in the group with bandages received corona.
The difference is not large enough to conclude that there is a benefit to using a sanitary napkin compared to protecting oneself.
The researchers write that there are limits to what can be deduced from the study.
- The study thus does not confirm the expected halving of the risk of infection of the wearer of the mouthpiece, but the results could indicate a more moderate degree of protection of 15-20 percent.
- However, the study can not rule out that the mask does not protect the wearer, the press release states.
The researchers emphasize that on the basis of this study, no conclusions can be drawn about the widespread use of sanitary napkins in the public as a measure to contain corona infection.
- It is emphasized that the study did not examine the function of the masks as a source control, ie to limit infection from an infected person wearing a mask to others.
- The study also did not shed light on the effect of bandages in situations where it is not possible to maintain the social distance.
- It should therefore be emphasized that these results cannot be used to raise doubts that the widespread use of masks outside of healthcare can be an effective means of reducing Sars-CoV-2 infections (coronavirus, ed.).
Now that the psychos in power realized that they can shutdown the entire world for whatever bullshit cause… they’ll keep doing it! The next crisis in climate change! Let’s lockdown the world!
Here’s a great article for my Canadian readers! Read it here. “Ten. That’s the number of otherwise healthy people who have died from COVID-19 in Alberta since the beginning of the pandemic.” The article is a gem. Save it, archive it.
It just never ends. Meanwhile in South Australia, after 2 cases were discovered (in a population of a few millions), people will only be able to leave their home for the following reasons (source);
To go to work as an emergency services worker or to worker providing essential services;
For agricultural work;
To receive medical care including seeking COVID-19 testing;
To obtain medical supplies;
One person from the household once a day to attend supermarkets to obtain essential supplies;
Organised end of life visits;
In an emergency situation.
One person per household will be allowed to leave the home to access groceries.
Finally, some great news from Germany. A local town removed their blanket mask rule after a citizen sue the city! We need more of that.
Out.
JP